Capitalism is Ethical


A 2017 poll found that Americans under 30 preferred an economic system based on collectivism (socialism, communism, or fascism) to capitalism, 58% to 42%.  There was not an explanation for why poll participants replied the way they did.  However, when you look at today’s economy I can think of a few:


  1. Ever increasing cost for health care, higher education, and real estate

  2. Slow economic growth and the resulting lack of jobs for new college graduates

  3. Stagnant growth in salaries and wages

  4. Higher income equality between working class to upper middle class


If a capitalistic economy produces the issues in that list, why shouldn’t we look for an alternative?  Can we truly say the US economic system is built with their needs in mind, when it seems like the rich and powerful are taking advantage of the rest of us?  Before I say anything else let me provide common definitions for “socialism” and “capitalism”.


Socialism is a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.  Capitalism is an economic system based on free markets and the rule of law with legal protections for private ownership.


Any human idea or system is not going to be perfect.  There will always be opportunities for misuse.  Some argue that it is inherent to capitalism for powerful people to exploit others.  Others believe exploitation can only be accomplished by moving away from capitalism towards a more centrally controlled economy.  I don’t have the ability to identify which is which.  What I want to do in this article is to think through what should happen to the common person when a free market economy is left to itself.  


One fascinating thought is that through a free market, equal application of law to each individual, and private ownership, one of socialism’s main claims is accomplished.  The community directs economic activity.  There isn’t a grand plan for the purpose of bringing this about.  It happens organically. Plus, think about it, how do normal members of the community get to directly influence the economy in socialism when more and more decisions are taken away and given to a central government or industrial committee?  It may seem counterintuitive, but people get more economic power when they are simply free to choose, not when laws are made for their benefit.  Let me leave you with 3 reasons why that is.


First, left by itself, it is the most democratic system in the world.  Within socialism the economy and politics are joined together more tightly,  which allows for a  tyranny of the majority.  If 51% of the people want to do something, then 100% are held accountable to participate.  In the US, there are laws in place, one example the Bill of RIghts,  just to protect minorities from this type of tyranny.  However, in capitalism minorities are served.  Not perfectly.  Not absolutely.  Still, the market takes into account each individual’s personal preferences, for the right price of course.  This happens because the ultimate authority is the consumer, who decides what is made for how much money and in what quantities.  No one individual gets whatever he or she wants but each individual gets to participate in the process by making choices.


Second, historically when markets develop it moves people toward production and trade of goods and away from war and confiscation.  In the ancient world there were few ways to “get rich”.  A common way was to take valuables by force.  Amassing wealth was tied to the exercise of violence whether by forcibly taking or maintaining power over a geographic area.  Capitalism encourages this movement by taking economic choice away from those wielding violence and giving it to those who better serve others.


Third, because the consumer is king, producers have to compete with one another to win his or her favor.  A natural result of this is that prices decrease over time through mass production and technological innovation, which means that the poor are able to have things that only the rich could afford previously.  If you look at global poverty statistics, you see the effect of this mechanism,  poverty rates have drastically decreased over the last 150 years.


Does any of this relate to the Bible and Christianity?  Sure it does.  One of my previous articles discussed how Western individualism was influenced by the Biblical idea that each person has a relationship with God.  God saves the individual.  God judges the individual.  Then when you read through the Bible it looks like the backdrop is a world where there is a free market, private property, and people making choices to materially better their lives.  We see this in Proverbs 31:10-31.  


10 Who can find a virtuous woman? For her price is far above rubies...  13 She seeketh wool, and flax, and worketh willingly with her hands.  14 She is like the merchants' ships; she bringeth her food from afar.  15 She riseth also while it is yet night, and giveth meat to her household, and a portion to her maidens.  16 She considereth a field, and buyeth it: with the fruit of her hands she planteth a vineyard....  18 She perceiveth that her merchandise is good: her candle goeth not out by night.  19 She layeth her hands to the spindle, and her hands hold the distaff...  24 She maketh fine linen, and selleth it; and delivereth girdles unto the merchant.  25 Strength and honour are her clothing; and she shall rejoice in time to come... 28 Her children arise up, and call her blessed; her husband also, and he praiseth her… 31 Give her of the fruit of her hands; and let her own works praise her in the gates.


Proverbs is a collection of wisdom from King Solomon to his son. All through it he describes what kind of behavior will lead to a long and enjoyable life. The excerpt above is not descriptive of a person Solomon knew. It is prescriptive of how live is supposed to work. The main character is a person of a non-privileged social class in the ancient world, but look at what kind of life God wants for women. She provides for her family,  She operates a small business.  She makes important economic decisions on her own.  She owns property.  She is praised by those who know her. Sounds like a good way to live.  Sounds like capitalism.  

Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular:

The Ethics Of Liberty - State Relationships Internal & External

Image
  The Ethics Of Liberty by Murray Rothbard Citizens' Relationship To The State In previous chapters Rothbard wrote about the illegitimacy of the state and inconsistencies found in the narratives supporting its existence.  However, the fact remains that states exist and will for the foreseeable future.  The next two chapters focus on how those ruled by the state should act and how states should interact with one another. To start, the state exists on the basis of aggression.  Not only does it set up a monopoly on the use of violence, placing limits on the natural right of self defense, it funds itself by taking money from the citizenry by force (i.e. taxation).  Therefore, as an illegitimate organization, individuals have no obligation to obey it.  In fact taking over government owned property, refusing to pay taxes, and lying to the state can be morally justified if you aren't committing a property crime against another private citizen.  Everything th...
Read more

Christians, Nations, And Their Relations

Image
Christians are having a lively debate discussing what kind of relationship they should have with the state or with the nations in which they live.  On one side you have those who claim that the only nation a Christian belongs to is their spiritu al nation, the universal church.  They minimize familial, social, and ethnic connections.  To them, nationalism of any type should be avoided because it leads to arrogance if not aggression against other nations.  To them, a Christian’s identity is made up solely by their direct relationship to God, their participation in the great commission, and their affiliation with the church.  They say that they have more in common with another Christian who lives on the other side of the world than their next door neighbor who does not believe. On the other side are those who call for Christians to enact laws in the land of their birth and enforce them strictly.  They support political leaders who are willing to coerce nonbel...
Read more

The Church And State In Romans 13

The proper relationship of the Church to the State has been discussed for centuries. Reading through history you can see the actual relationship has evolved over time. When the Church first started, the Roman State was their adversary with chronic and acute persecutions. From the time Constantine made Christianity the official religion of his empire through the Reformation, the relationship could roughly be characterized as a series of alliances. By the time the United States of America was founded, the relationship was no longer an alliance. In theory, churches were free to conduct their business without disturbance by the State, but the State no longer supported a particular religion or denomination. The purpose of this situation was to promote peace between the increasing number of different groups within Christianity and between each of them and the State. However, through the 20th Century to today, the government and culture has become more and more secular. The safeg...
Read more

Human Life Straddles Two Realities

Image
  Human beings were created in the image of God.  Classical philosophers stated that the human ability to reason was the key to understanding what that meant.  After hundreds of years of searching the bounds of reason, philosophers became frustrated.  Following reason alone did not produce the solutions they sought.  As a result, during the 17th century some philosophers in the West started to emphasize emotion.  Our intellectual and political elites have walked us down this other path for another couple of hundred years.  Society in the 21 Century has reached the end of that journey.  It has lead us to a place of confusion, division, and despair. I propose that the problem is both efforts considered only one aspect of  the human soul and neglected the other.  God demonstrates both reason and emotion in the Bible.  As His image, both constitute our substance.  We live simultaneously in two worlds, the objective and subjective....
Read more

Private Property In Israel

Image
One of the major themes in the Bible is God’s redemption of the nation of Israel.  God made a promise of land to the sons of Abraham, but generations later his descendants were enslaved in Egypt.  From Exodus to Joshua, you see the activity of God to bring them out of that slavery and into a new land that He had promised them long ago.  He promised them freedom.  On Mount Sinai God gave Moses the laws He wanted the nation of Israel to live by, so that they could experience freedom.  Previously, I focused on the laws against charging usury (interest) to the poor who needed to borrow money for necessities.  Now, I would like to look at another economic aspect of the Mosaic law, the establishment of private property. First, we will look at the books of Joshua and Leviticus to understand how land was distributed and who in effect had ownership.  Then we can think about why private property was so important to accomplishing God’s goals for Israel.  As ...
Read more

The Ethics Of Liberty - Children And Rights

Image
  I have to admit up front, this chapter contains my biggest disagreement with Rothbard so far.  In "Children And Rights", he starts with discussing the rights of parents to abort and neglect their children before partially redeeming himself by focusing his searchlight back onto government's aggression against children and parents. He starts the chapter describing his philosophy on abortion.  I disagree out of the gate.  Uncharacteristically he provides no logical or natural law basis for his foundation.  Instead, he throws out an assertion and starts applying his normal deduction atop this faulty starting point.                 "[with] birth as the beginning of a live human being possessing natural rights...                     While birth is indeed the proper line of demarcation, the usual formation makes           ...
Read more