Freedom, Where Does It Come From?

Here is something else I wrote about years ago, looking at the value the Bible places on the individual.  If God relates to persons more than groups how does that affect the way we see human interaction.  I posted this now as an intro into a longer article that I am in the process of writing, describing further my thoughts on God's created order and how we fit into it.

If you find my thoughts interesting, please make a comment below and tell a friend.  Peace!

The President of the United States of America (not the awesome music group) many times is referred to as “The Leader Of The Free World”.  Where do we get this idea from?  The Free World.  What are we freed from?  What are we now free to do?  Somewhere in the corner of your mind I hope you realize the question is to you individually.  If you don’t get to exercise freedom in your own specific life, is it really worth anything?

A place to start to understand freedom is in the letter Paul wrote to Gaelic people in Asia Minor.

Galatians 5:5:  It was for freedom that Christ set us free; therefore keep standing firm and do not be subject again to a yoke of slavery.

In Paul’s letter he is calling us to be free from disobedience to God our Father.  The yoke of slavery is sin.  You and I are now free to obey by placing our faith in Jesus.  But there is more there if you think about it.  Paul is also describing freedom from family traditions or cultural obligations.  We live in a culture today where those things aren’t a big deal.  However, pre-modern human society was built upon the idea of tribal identity.  The tribe (your family essentially) lived life one way, which meant everyone lived life that way.  You weren’t free to choose for yourself.  If your tribe attacked another tribe to get revenge, then you attacked.  You didn’t get to choose what you wanted to do or think about how to achieve true justice.

The Hebrews in the Jewish Scriptures grew up with this same mind set, but even then God was teaching them more than 2500 years ago that He deals mainly with individuals not groups.

Ezekiel 18: 14 Now behold, he has a son who has observed all his father’s sins which he committed, and observing does not do likewise. 15 He does not eat at the mountain shrines or lift up his eyes to the idols of the house of Israel, or defile his neighbor’s wife, 16 or oppress anyone, or retain a pledge, or commit robbery, but he gives his bread to the hungry and covers the naked with clothing, 17 he keeps his hand from the poor, does not take interest or increase, but executes My ordinances, and walks in My statutes; he will not die for his father’s iniquity, he will surely live. 18 As for his father, because he practiced extortion, robbed his brother and did what was not good among his people, behold, he will die for his iniquity. 19 “Yet you say, ‘Why should the son not bear the punishment for the father’s iniquity?’ When the son has practiced justice and righteousness and has observed all My statutes and done them, he shall surely live. 20 The person who sins will die. The son will not bear the punishment for the father’s iniquity, nor will the father bear the punishment for the son’s iniquity; the righteousness of the righteous will be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked will be upon himself.

It should be clear from what God tells Ezekiel that He is confronting, though of second importance, the idea of tribal identity.  Individuals are guilty or innocent before Him, not groups.  You don’t have to suffer for what someone else does, but you won’t be blessed for someone else’s obedience either.  That was a revolutionary idea in the ancient world where pagan religions focused on tribal guilt and atonement.  You can even read the Israelites push back on this concept in verse 19.

The idea of personal forgiveness before God or personal judgment seen throughout the Bible provides a basis for the philosophical concept called individualism.  If God deals with individuals, then we should deal with other people as individuals.  Paul makes that perfectly clear in another part of Galatians.


Galatians 3:  26 For you are all sons of God through faith in Christ Jesus. 27 For all of you who were baptized into Christ have clothed yourselves with Christ.28 There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free man, there is neither male nor female; for you are all one in Christ Jesus.29 And if you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s descendants, heirs according to promise.

The group identity is stripped off of each individual in the passage above, and as a result it is seen that each person has equal value and is unified in their humanity alone.  This idea for hundreds of years has worked its way through twists and turns into the Church and Western culture.  Progress has been slow and inconsistent, but the American values we have today go back to the gospel you see in Galatians 3:26-29.  We know not to discriminate on the basis of race, gender, education level, religious practice, and political affiliation.  We say things like “you do you boo” because we celebrate individualism.  Looking back we can see how individualism played a role in the development of the Renaissance, the Protestant Reformation, the Enlightenment, Scientific Method, the Industrial Revolution, Columbian exchange and Democracy. 

To be sure, we, as fallen people, can misuse individualism to our harm.  Still, the exciting world we live in today is based on personal freedom, which starts with God personally freeing us from sin through the gospel of His Son Jesus Christ.


Comments

Post a Comment

Most Popular:

The Ethics Of Liberty - State Relationships Internal & External

Image
  The Ethics Of Liberty by Murray Rothbard Citizens' Relationship To The State In previous chapters Rothbard wrote about the illegitimacy of the state and inconsistencies found in the narratives supporting its existence.  However, the fact remains that states exist and will for the foreseeable future.  The next two chapters focus on how those ruled by the state should act and how states should interact with one another. To start, the state exists on the basis of aggression.  Not only does it set up a monopoly on the use of violence, placing limits on the natural right of self defense, it funds itself by taking money from the citizenry by force (i.e. taxation).  Therefore, as an illegitimate organization, individuals have no obligation to obey it.  In fact taking over government owned property, refusing to pay taxes, and lying to the state can be morally justified if you aren't committing a property crime against another private citizen.  Everything th...
Read more

Christians, Nations, And Their Relations

Image
Christians are having a lively debate discussing what kind of relationship they should have with the state or with the nations in which they live.  On one side you have those who claim that the only nation a Christian belongs to is their spiritu al nation, the universal church.  They minimize familial, social, and ethnic connections.  To them, nationalism of any type should be avoided because it leads to arrogance if not aggression against other nations.  To them, a Christian’s identity is made up solely by their direct relationship to God, their participation in the great commission, and their affiliation with the church.  They say that they have more in common with another Christian who lives on the other side of the world than their next door neighbor who does not believe. On the other side are those who call for Christians to enact laws in the land of their birth and enforce them strictly.  They support political leaders who are willing to coerce nonbel...
Read more

The Church And State In Romans 13

The proper relationship of the Church to the State has been discussed for centuries. Reading through history you can see the actual relationship has evolved over time. When the Church first started, the Roman State was their adversary with chronic and acute persecutions. From the time Constantine made Christianity the official religion of his empire through the Reformation, the relationship could roughly be characterized as a series of alliances. By the time the United States of America was founded, the relationship was no longer an alliance. In theory, churches were free to conduct their business without disturbance by the State, but the State no longer supported a particular religion or denomination. The purpose of this situation was to promote peace between the increasing number of different groups within Christianity and between each of them and the State. However, through the 20th Century to today, the government and culture has become more and more secular. The safeg...
Read more

Human Life Straddles Two Realities

Image
  Human beings were created in the image of God.  Classical philosophers stated that the human ability to reason was the key to understanding what that meant.  After hundreds of years of searching the bounds of reason, philosophers became frustrated.  Following reason alone did not produce the solutions they sought.  As a result, during the 17th century some philosophers in the West started to emphasize emotion.  Our intellectual and political elites have walked us down this other path for another couple of hundred years.  Society in the 21 Century has reached the end of that journey.  It has lead us to a place of confusion, division, and despair. I propose that the problem is both efforts considered only one aspect of  the human soul and neglected the other.  God demonstrates both reason and emotion in the Bible.  As His image, both constitute our substance.  We live simultaneously in two worlds, the objective and subjective....
Read more

Private Property In Israel

Image
One of the major themes in the Bible is God’s redemption of the nation of Israel.  God made a promise of land to the sons of Abraham, but generations later his descendants were enslaved in Egypt.  From Exodus to Joshua, you see the activity of God to bring them out of that slavery and into a new land that He had promised them long ago.  He promised them freedom.  On Mount Sinai God gave Moses the laws He wanted the nation of Israel to live by, so that they could experience freedom.  Previously, I focused on the laws against charging usury (interest) to the poor who needed to borrow money for necessities.  Now, I would like to look at another economic aspect of the Mosaic law, the establishment of private property. First, we will look at the books of Joshua and Leviticus to understand how land was distributed and who in effect had ownership.  Then we can think about why private property was so important to accomplishing God’s goals for Israel.  As ...
Read more

The Ethics Of Liberty - Children And Rights

Image
  I have to admit up front, this chapter contains my biggest disagreement with Rothbard so far.  In "Children And Rights", he starts with discussing the rights of parents to abort and neglect their children before partially redeeming himself by focusing his searchlight back onto government's aggression against children and parents. He starts the chapter describing his philosophy on abortion.  I disagree out of the gate.  Uncharacteristically he provides no logical or natural law basis for his foundation.  Instead, he throws out an assertion and starts applying his normal deduction atop this faulty starting point.                 "[with] birth as the beginning of a live human being possessing natural rights...                     While birth is indeed the proper line of demarcation, the usual formation makes           ...
Read more